The bar we hold reviews to.

Peptide Reviews is editorially independent. We do not accept payment in exchange for favourable coverage, score adjustments or to suppress a review.

Affiliate relationships, where they exist, are disclosed on our Affiliate Disclosure page and never influence scoring.

Reviews cite peer-reviewed literature, regulatory filings, clinical trial registries and primary supplier documentation where available.

Where evidence is contested or sparse, we say so and reflect that uncertainty in scoring.

Every review is reviewed by at least one editorial reviewer in addition to the lead writer, then goes through a final verification step before publication.

Reviewers must declare any commercial relationships that could affect their judgement on a particular peptide; conflicts result in reassignment.

If we get something wrong, we correct it visibly, date the correction, and update the last-updated stamp. Significant corrections are noted in the review itself.

If you spot an error, please contact us — see the Contact page.

We will: describe research, summarise regulatory status, document supplier transparency, and assign a transparent score.

We won't: recommend that any reader purchase or use any peptide, publish dosing or how-to-use instructions, or imply that research compounds are safe for human use.